<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DENIS O&#8217;BRIEN : THE BAILOUT KING</title>
	<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2013/02/08/denis-obrien-the-bailout-king/</link>
	<description>Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Donagh</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2013/02/08/denis-obrien-the-bailout-king/#comment-81419</link>
		<author>Donagh</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2013/02/08/denis-obrien-the-bailout-king/#comment-81419</guid>
		<description>O'Brien took out the 500m loans from Anglo to pay for his attempt to control Independent News and Media. INM, however, had financing problems and a bond was due to be redeemed. In the end they couldn't pay the bond, so the debt was restructured. This meant that the value of the shares that O'Brien had spent the Anglo loan on were wiped out as part of the restructuring. 

From the Sunday Times: &lt;blockquote&gt; “His most painful investment has been Independent News &#38; Media, whose stable includes the Irish Independent. Between 2006 and 2009 he built a 26% stake at a cost of more than €510m. During that period the group’s newspapers ran articles critical of him.
He engaged in a bitter wrangle over the company’s direction with Sir Tony O’Reilly, the long-time chief executive. O’Brien eventually won his campaign to force out O’Reilly, who retired in 2009.
 Financially, however, the business was a disaster for him. The publisher was hit hard by the economic slowdown and in 2009 it was forced into a debt-for-equity swap that virtually wiped out investors.
O’Brien, still the biggest single investor, was left nursing a €500m paper loss. Worse, he would have to look elsewhere to repay Barclays Bank and Anglo Irish Bank, which funded the share spree.”&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
This doesn't point out the fact that O'Brien took out the loan for the shares from Anglo after it was nationalised. 

Burning bond holders and debt restructuring is common practice, except when it comes to Anglo. The loan is going to be bought from the Central Bank of Ireland via a NAMA Bond. Let's say that O'Brien and McKillen don't pay. The loss would immediately be a sovereign one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Brien took out the 500m loans from Anglo to pay for his attempt to control Independent News and Media. INM, however, had financing problems and a bond was due to be redeemed. In the end they couldn&#8217;t pay the bond, so the debt was restructured. This meant that the value of the shares that O&#8217;Brien had spent the Anglo loan on were wiped out as part of the restructuring. </p>
<p>From the Sunday Times:<br />
<blockquote> “His most painful investment has been Independent News &amp; Media, whose stable includes the Irish Independent. Between 2006 and 2009 he built a 26% stake at a cost of more than €510m. During that period the group’s newspapers ran articles critical of him.<br />
He engaged in a bitter wrangle over the company’s direction with Sir Tony O’Reilly, the long-time chief executive. O’Brien eventually won his campaign to force out O’Reilly, who retired in 2009.<br />
 Financially, however, the business was a disaster for him. The publisher was hit hard by the economic slowdown and in 2009 it was forced into a debt-for-equity swap that virtually wiped out investors.<br />
O’Brien, still the biggest single investor, was left nursing a €500m paper loss. Worse, he would have to look elsewhere to repay Barclays Bank and Anglo Irish Bank, which funded the share spree.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t point out the fact that O&#8217;Brien took out the loan for the shares from Anglo after it was nationalised. </p>
<p>Burning bond holders and debt restructuring is common practice, except when it comes to Anglo. The loan is going to be bought from the Central Bank of Ireland via a NAMA Bond. Let&#8217;s say that O&#8217;Brien and McKillen don&#8217;t pay. The loss would immediately be a sovereign one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghan</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2013/02/08/denis-obrien-the-bailout-king/#comment-81418</link>
		<author>Eoghan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2013/02/08/denis-obrien-the-bailout-king/#comment-81418</guid>
		<description>Complete c*nt.  What does he even do with all the money?  Perhaps my lack of imagination is why I will never reach such dreamy heights...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete c*nt.  What does he even do with all the money?  Perhaps my lack of imagination is why I will never reach such dreamy heights&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
