<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE CASE FOR A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAX - ICTU</title>
	<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2012/11/20/the-case-for-a-transaction-tax-ictu/</link>
	<description>Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: pangur ban</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2012/11/20/the-case-for-a-transaction-tax-ictu/#comment-80051</link>
		<author>pangur ban</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2012/11/20/the-case-for-a-transaction-tax-ictu/#comment-80051</guid>
		<description>part of our problem is that most of our banks are mostly nationalised</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>part of our problem is that most of our banks are mostly nationalised</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMF</title>
		<link>http://dublinopinion.com/2012/11/20/the-case-for-a-transaction-tax-ictu/#comment-80022</link>
		<author>OMF</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dublinopinion.com/2012/11/20/the-case-for-a-transaction-tax-ictu/#comment-80022</guid>
		<description>Unless the tax is measured in bankers' skulls, I don't see that it can be regarded as either fair or substantial.

These industries need to be nationalised, not taxed. The Trade Union movement shouldn't be afraid to say so either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless the tax is measured in bankers&#8217; skulls, I don&#8217;t see that it can be regarded as either fair or substantial.</p>
<p>These industries need to be nationalised, not taxed. The Trade Union movement shouldn&#8217;t be afraid to say so either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
