Man in a Suitcase
Apr 18th, 2007 by Conor McCabe
It must be a bitch to date Fine Gael.
I mean, one day she’s promising to get all down and dirty, the next she’s in the church saying rosaries for our souls. All hard-on and no pay-off. It’s enough to make any sane man despair.
The allegations in the Sunday independent regarding Bertie Ahern – allegations involving, once again, cash and Manchester – are now believed to have been given to the paper by Fine Gael MEP Jim Higgins. Today, Enda Kenny has come out and said that:
“If a Fine Gael source was in touch with the papers, and I would hope they were not, it was done without my imprimatur or the imprimatur of the Fine Gael front bench. We have no interest in a dirty tricks campaign.â€
Normally, a statement like this is released once the damage has been done; to give the leader some distance, while his opponent feels the heat. In Kenny’s case, he has distanced himself because his party is the one under pressure. It would be wrong to say the tactic backfired – more accurately, this was a move without tactics. Kenny is quoted in today’s Independent as saying that “I never involved myself in 32 years in public life in personal animosity or personal degradation of any candidate, irrespective of who they represent, all parties and none.â€
It is as if Kenny got to be leader of his party because he ran a nice campaign – that he got to be the head of Fine Gael by being nice to everybody. And that is simply ridiculous.
Once again we’re going to hear about Bertie the Teflon Taoiseach, and how any personal attacks on the man backfire for the opposition. But Bertie’s teflonosity is a bit like stamp duty – a cover story for the real issue.
The focus of the story has now moved to whether Fine Gael is conducting a smear campaign against a man who signed blank cheques for Charlie Haughey, took thousands of pounds of cash off strangers in a Manchester hotel, who apparently cashed his pay cheques in a pub or shop and kept around £50,000 in cash in his house, and who faces serious questions over his Bertie bowl.
Conducting a smear campaign? Bertie’s doing a grand job all on his own.
But the fact that the story has been allowed to move against Fine Gael is a simple sign of the fragmentation in the party at senior tactical level. Kenny now admits that Jim Higgins leaked the story to the Sunday Independent without his knowledge.
What type of party has an MEP who leaks a story about the Taoiseach to the biggest-selling Sunday newspaper in the country, and who neglects to inform his leader – the main opposition leader – about it? Although Kenny now admits that he knew the story was to run, he maintains he knew nothing about it, and certainly did not approve the leak.
Kenny knows, but doesn’t know. He spends all of Sunday and Monday waiting to see what happens, and then on Tuesday tells the press he didn’t approve the leak.
Surely if he didn’t approve, he didn’t approve on Sunday, and he didn’t approve on Monday as well? Kenny waited because he wanted to see what would happen, to see if others would smell blood and pounce on Tayto Ahern for him.
But here’s the deal. That’s Kenny’s job. He dithered because he wanted someone else to do the work for him, the work of opposing the Taoiseach. The fact of the matter is that Kenny is a crap opposition leader. And if he isn’t able to draw blood from a Taoiseach who has a dubious relationship with cash, he should stick to teaching.
With about four weeks to go before the election – and I’m putting my money on the 17th of May so as to save Bertie a tribunal appearance – Kenny is the only alternative Taoiseach the system allows. Let’s hope he can stamp some authority on his party, and that no scandals involving Bertie arrive.
This is the position Kenny finds himself in at the moment –his lack of an opposition killer instinct means that Bertie’s fuck-ups rebound on Kenny.
For the country’s sake, let’s hope the election is called before the tribunal season begins. I don’t think the opposition could take any more bad press about the Taoiseach.

The one person who most definitely did *not* leak the story to the Sindo was Jim Higgins.
so Fine Gael can’t even get their apologies correct? Kenny distanced himself from a leak that higgins had nothing to do with? What a mess.
I am not an FG supporter, but it upsets me to see you getting your criticism into a mess. I’ll take your word that Kenny distanced himself from the leak; my point is not that it was not an FG leak - it seems likely to have been - but that Higgins was not the leaker. You took it as a given that he was and even appeared to attribute that assumption to Kenny. There is no justification that I can see for either.
By the way, your website clock still seems to be on winter time.
Why did Higgins say on radio on Sunday - Sam Smyth’s programme on Today FM - regarding the story that his job was done now that the allegation was in the public domain? A curious statement for a man who defitely didn’t have anything to do with it.
And you don’t have to take my word about Kenny distancing himself from the leak - The distance quote is in the article. The mess is that Fine Gael leaked the suitcase story, which came from Jim Higgin’s personal driver when he was a minister, and then spend the week trying to make out they didn’t, on top of a leader who says that he wants nothing to do with it.
So what was the point of the leak then?
Summer time is for whimps.
Yes Ben, more Stalinism, less Brezhnevism - it’s been long overdue in the fine gaels….
Well… in fairness Stalin Báite, they did go looking for advice back in 1990 from Eoghan Harris… So perhaps not so much overdue, but overlooked in the intervening period…
A quote from The Phoenix, 4 May 2007 - “Jody Corcoran and the Sindo”
“Jody [Corcoran]’s article on that spineless FG Senator Jom Higgins - he had leaked the new Bertiegate story to Corcoran but then backtracked furiously when the story rebounded on the party - said more about the journalist and his newspaper than the senator.”