That Boy Needs Therapy
Jan 11th, 2007 by Donagh
Play the song while reading the text below.
Last night Bush told the American nation that he’s ordering 21,500 more troops into Iraq. Comparisons with The Vietnam War continue to abound, and some have likened the move to that of President Lyndon Johnson’s decision to increase troops in Vietnam and imagine that it’ll achieve the same level of success.
That such a move, which is contrary to the suggestions of the Iraq Survey Group, is so blatantly wrong has led some to think that Bush is not just bad at his job, he’s mad too.
Paul Krugman, the New York Times columnist says that Iraq is “a quagmire of the vanities - a place where America is spending blood and treasure to protect the egos of men who won’t admit that they were wrong”.
Writing in the Daily Kos, psychiatrist Paul Minot says that Bush clearly has a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
“What this means, mostly, is that he has rather desperate insecurities about himself, and compensates by constructing a grandiose self-image. Most of his relationships are either mirroring relationships–people who flatter him and reinforce his grandiosity–or idealized self-objects–people that he himself thinks alot of, and hence feels flattered by his association. Some likely perform both functions. Hence his weakness for sycophants like Harriet Miers, and powerful personalities like Dick Cheney.”
But, argues Minot, this is not to say that he’s psychotic.
“The lapses in reality-testing that he exhibits are the sort that can be readily explained by his characterological insensitivity to the feelings and perceptions of others, due to his persistently self-centered frame of reference. By applying Occam’s Razor to the question of what is psychologically driving Bush to endorse this “surge”, I think it can be readily explained by his narcissism.”
Now why would George use the lives of US soldiers and Iraqis, for that matter, like gambling chips just to save his political skin? Well, concludes, Minot, because he’s “that narcissistic, that desperate, and yes, that sociopathic as well.”
There’s also a book out called Bush on the Couch, written by psychiatrist Justin A. Frank which explores, along with others things, Bush’s “rigid and simplistic thought patterns, paranoia, and megalomania — and how they have driven him to invent adversaries so that he can destroy them.”
I wouldn’t say he’s mad, or bad in the sense of being evil or mendacious . He’s just a politician, albeit an incompetent one, who’s looking out for his own best interests. Of course, he’s also the world’s most powerful politician and as we know, power can go to a fella’s head.
“…I’m afraid expulsion is the ONLY answer…”
Update
From the Paul Krugman ‘Quagmire of the Vanities’ article:
Daniel Kahneman, who won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science for his research on irrationality in decision-making, thinks [the proponents of the planned ’surge’] are delusional. Mr. Kahneman and Jonathan Renshon recently argued in Foreign Policy magazine that the administration’s unwillingness to face reality in Iraq reflects a basic human aversion to cutting one’s losses — the same instinct that makes gamblers stay at the table, hoping to break even.
So, should the Americans and British pull out and let all factions blow themselves to pieces at this point? Vietnam was very bad for two years after that pullout. I believe that the US will pull back to Kuwait and the Emirates, if this last effort does not work.
The strange thing is, all of the inteviews with the enlisted troops and their commanders say that they feel they need to stay and get the security under control. And that comes from all of the news agencies. That might not be possible with the all out secretarian violence now killing so many daily.
So much for the grand democratic experiment in the mideast…
Sorry for taking so long to reply. It seems that they are blowing themselves to pieces anyway. Pulling out would mean that the government would collapse almost immediately. Clearly they can’t be left to implode. What I’d like to see though has little chance of happening although its the safest and best solution. What Iraq needs is a truely international solution which would include, at least diplomatically, the assistance of Syria and Iran. With an international force the US would no longer be seen as an exacerbating factor.
This international force has to act to prevent further civil war. I can’t see it happening though.
I think its too optimistic to say that the US can get the insurgency under control. They are seen as a colonising force and as the history of the colonized has shown, insurgency can go on for centuries.
Yes, I agree that the idea of controlling the insurgency is done at this point. I know Syria and Iran need to be engaged (Russia and China had to be engaged during the Korean war even as they participated against the US) as distasteful as that option is to the US administration. An international force is unlikely as most of the world sees this as a US derived, preemptive war and feels that this is our mess to clean. Ghosts from France and Indochina? History lessons doomed to repeat.
I can hear the thuk thuk thuk of the blades as the helicopters start
lifting everyone out of the Green Zone.We’ve done it before and we’ll hopefully do it again real soon.